The members of this group are also those who are much less involved in the administration of SPG, each from the management viewpoint and from that of the share of food expenditure managed via SPG. These two variables clearly define these topics as comparatively passive and occasional users. Furthermore, ranging from the evaluation of the principle parts, cluster three seems to be essentially the most “skeptical” of the 4 groups with very low values of all factor components, with the exception curiosity for environmental issues . Interestingly, additionally, variables related to food geographical origin and food miles are positioned at an intermediate stage between clusters 2 and 1, still underlining that preferences for local food appear much less relevant in respect to different food merchandise. On the alternative, the “social dimension” part, linked to the perception of food spending as a moment of delight, socialization, and sharing, is lowly thought-about.…